Recently Updated Pages

ARRL DXCC ENTITY RE-EVALUATION MEMORANDUM – EU EU — BELARUS (Byelorussian SSR) Evaluation Under ...

ARRL DXCC ENTITY RE-EVALUATION MEMORANDUM – ES ES — ESTONIA Evaluation Under Post-War 1947 DXCC ...

ARRL DXCC ENTITY RE-EVALUATION MEMORANDUM – EA6 EA6 — BALEARIC ISLANDS Evaluation Under Post-War...

ARRL DXCC ENTITY RE-EVALUATION MEMORANDUM – A6 A6 — UNITED ARAB EMIRATES (Trucial States Prior t...

ARRL DXCC ENTITY RE-EVALUATION MEMORANDUM – EA8 EA8 — CANARY ISLANDS Evaluation Under Post-War 1...

Introduction to Re-Evaluation Memorandums The following Re-Evaluation Memorandums examine each o...

Reconciliation of Interpretations: DXCC2000 and the Evolution of Political Qualification (1988–2...

Historical Context of Early Qualification Frameworks Although formal published DXCC qualificatio...

Historical context summary:In 1947, Burma (now Myanmar) had already completed the essential legal...

Under the 1960 rules, Laos clearly qualifies as a Political DXCC Entity, because it had already a...

ARRL DXCC ENTITY RE-EVALUATION MEMORANDUM – BU BU — TAIWAN (FORMOSA / REPUBLIC OF CHINA)Evaluati...

Tuvalu became independent in 1978, but the 1976 rules governed the transitional period when Tuval...

Comparative Study of DXCC Entity Qualification Case Studies Evolution of Criteria, Precedent, I...

Case Study: Western Sahara Disputed Territory and Administrative Attribution in DXCC Entity Qua...

Case Study: Somaliland De Facto Statehood and the Limits of International Recognition in DXCC P...

Case Study: Principality of Seborga Literal Interpretation vs. Intended Meaning in DXCC Politic...

Case Study: Turkish Republic of Northern Cyprus Political Recognition and the Limits of DXCC Ent...

  Case Study: 4U1A — United Nations Vienna International Centre Historical Precedent, Interpret...

Acknowledgments This History document originated as an outgrowth of work performed within the DX ...

How to Read the Re-Evaluation Memorandums Each Re-Evaluation Memorandum assesses a DXCC Entity us...